"Photojournalistic Wedding Photographer" is something that a lot of photographers bandy about these days (well, the past five years anyhow). And it's the label a lot of photographers are using, without technically being one. I've called myself a photojournalistic wedding photographer since I began, as catching the moments as they happen, in an unobtrusive way (and not creating or setting up moments) is what I've always been all about. I understand the need to take portraits, but even when I'm shooting portraits, I usually just ask the bride and groom to interact with one another, and be themselves, while I shoot them, instead of the 'put your hand in your pocket, tilt your head this way, look that way,' approach. I like to try and capture who people really are.
The reason I'm telling you all this, is because I got an email today, telling me I was accepted into the Wedding Photojournalist Association. This is huge, for me, as it validates my photography style, confirming that I really am a photojournalistic wedding photographer. They have a stringent screening process. They even state, "The Wedding Photojournalist Association is a highly screened, critical organization. Less than 5% of wedding photographers out there qualify for membership.
and
Leading the way in Wedding Photojournalism, WPJA represents the most discriminating talent around the world technically, creatively and visually. Qualified members hold industry-leading standards, skills and business integrity. And...to celebrate the photographers who document and record the found moment. "
And...
What sets our members apart in the industry is their candid, documentary approach – a distinctly artistic vision toward wedding photography.
So to be included with the amazing photographers they have listed on their site is an honor, and a thrill. And now, I am a member of not only the Wedding and Portrait Photographers International, but also the WPJA.
